Despite the challenging investment environment at the beginning of the year, investors remain interested in the sector and are specifically monitoring the advanced projects which are approaching key milestones. With confidence returning to global equity markets in recent months and the Senate having passed the Federal Government’s renewable energy target (RET) legislation in August, the AGI is hovering at around $450 million, up 36% from its recent lows. With market sentiments improving, successful first round Geothermal Drilling Program (GDP) grant recipients, Petratherm (ASX: PTR) and Panax Geothermal Ltd (ASX: PAX) led the capital raising efforts earlier in the year by bolstering their balance sheets by $7 million and $9.3 million respectively. More recently Green Rock Energy (ASX: GRK) also managed to successfully place $1.43 million through a private placement.
With more than 50 private geothermal companies active in Australia and appetite for risk returning to financial markets, a string of initial public offerings are expected in the next 3-9 months, with Sydney based Granite Power likely to be the first to hit the market with an expected $50 million IPO later this year or possibly early next year. Activated Logic believes the recent flurry of investment in the geothermal sector is part of a broader theme in investment markets with the global financial crisis proving to be a strong catalyst for the increased interest in both ethical and sustainable investments. The increased interest in renewable energy is also supported by a platform of macroeconomic measures including strong government support for developing and installing sustainable sources of power generation.
A report released by HSBC Global Research earlier this year estimated that “more than US$430 billion out of the US$2.8 trillion in tax cuts, credits and extra spending by governments has been allocated to climate change investment themes”.
All Australian states now have an established framework in place for the licensing and regulation of geothermal exploration activities, however the majority of exploration activity remains firmly focused on South Australia. South Australia already has an established and growing wind-power industry and earlier this year the State Government bolstered its green credentials by committing the state to an ambitious renewable energy target of 33% by 2020, significantly higher than the recently approved 20% by 2020 National renewable energy target.
In an effort to demonstrate the benefits of investing in renewable energy infrastructure, last week the Australian Geothermal Energy Association (AGEA) released a report prepared by energy consultants McLennan Magasanik Associates into the major electricity transmission infrastructure in South Australia. The major finding was “The cost of bringing forward transmission investment compared to the business as-usual case is estimated at $171 million and is dwarfed by the clear benefits arising from cheaper base load power delivered to the NEM (National Electricity Market)”.
The report further concluded that “this would result in net economic benefits of $1.06 billion for SA customers and the geothermal industry from 2011 to 2030”.
AGEA is proposing the development of major electricity transmission infrastructure “linking geothermal projects in the northern part of South Australia to the National Electricity Market” as a means to “link Australia’s two most advanced geothermal energy projects – Geodynamics’ Habanero project in the Cooper Basin and Petratherm’s Paralana project in the northern Flinders Ranges”.
Activated Logic recognises the potential benefits which may be realised through the development of such an infrastructure initiative, however believes this option needs to be compared and contrasted with other potential options available for the development of the Australian geothermal industry as a whole.
Activated Logic Managing Director Mr Bahay Ozcakmak said a broader range of initiatives need to be considered to accelerate the development of the Australian geothermal industry.
“Traditionally, the successful commercialisation of emerging technologies requires significant and enduring technical and financial support during the research, optimisation and demonstration stages of project development. In light of recent challenges faced by the Australian Engineered Geothermal System (EGS) developers, both South Australian based Geodynamics (ASX: GDY) and Petratherm (ASX: PTR) have experienced unexpected issues. A month after Geodynamics demonstrated positive proof of concept results at the end of March this year, the company announced a major “blow-out” at its flagship Habanero-3 well. Petratherm is also experiencing a challenging drilling environment with the Paralana well taking longer to drill than first thought. The EGS arena has been just as eventful in North America at the Geysers in California operated by AltaRock being halted earlier this month due to formation issues”.
“We are familiar with the respective projects operated by Geodynamics and Petratherm and obviously share the same hope and optimism the rest of the sector shares, however we believe the industry has more immediate challenges”.
“Given there are around 70 companies in Australia with interests in geothermal energy exploration and development, and the major need for funds to further assist in the optimisation of deep-drilling and reservoir stimulation, I think it would be very difficult to justify the concentration of investment on infrastructure that will largely benefit two particular companies”.
“The proposed “bringing forward” of transmission related investments at a cost of $171 million needs to be put into context of the Federal Government’s $50m Geothermal Drilling Program which will provide 7 separate geothermal projects with the opportunity to demonstrate project proof of concept.”
“Our analysis shows a much higher expected return on investment for investment at the earlier stages of project commercialisation by reducing the technical risk associated with geothermal projects in Australia and increasing the likelihood of attracting direct investment and achieving commercial success”.
“Our view is consistent with the detailed renewable energy commercialisation study conducted by New York University’s Stern School of Business which found that with US$3 billion of early stage technology based investment, geothermal energy generation could be competitive with coal by 2012”.
“In a capital constrained environment, prospective investors are heavily discounting the prospects of remote geothermal projects heavily. Investors are asking themselves, if company A is going to need $300 million of powerlines before they make a penny, what are my chances of achieving a return commensurate with the level of risk I am taking? In many cases, remote projects host very attractive geology, in some cases world-class tenure; however the sheer distance from population centres or industrial customers requires an enormous investment hurdle cautious investors are reluctant to get over”.